EXPERIMENTAL REPORT: Driver stress and performance on a driving simulator

TITLE: Driver stress and performance on a driving simulator
AUTHOR: Matthews, G., Dorn, L., Hoyes, T.W., Davies, D.R., Glendon, A.I., Taylor, R.G.
JOURNAL: Hum Factors. 1998 Mar;40(1):136-49.
ABSTRACT:  "Effects of stress on driving performance can depend on the nature of driver's stress reactions and on the traffic environment. In an experimental study, we assessed multiple dimensions of vulnerability to driver stress by a questionnaire that was validated in previous field studies and related those dimensions to performance on a driving simulator. Results were broadly consistent with prediction. A dimension of habitual dislike of driving was associated with reduced control skills, greater caution, and disturbance of moods. A measure of aggressive driving predicted more frequent and more error-prone overtaking, which are effects attributed to the use of confrontive coping strategies in interaction with other vehicles. An alertness measure predicted speed of reaction to pedestrian hazards. This research has practical applications for system design, automated monitoring of driver performance, selection and assessment of drivers, and training."
 
MY TAKE ON IT: One thing that seems to be missing for discussion of driving phobia is the extent to which it is not purely irrational.  This study shows that dislike of driving was associated with having poorer driving control skills making more frequent driving errors, caution when driving and stress. The suggestion is that stressed drivers might not have any more accidents, but this may be not because they have normal skill levels, but because the avoid taking risks.

REVIEW ARTICLE: Virtual Reality in Anxiety Disorders by Gorini, A & Riva, G

Virtual reality is a method for exposing phobic drivers to the situations they fear under controlled, interactive and safe conditions. The paper described below explains how virtual reality is used in the treatment of a range of phobias and provides a good background before tackling the more detailed experimental papers relating to the use of virtual reality in treating driving phobia (such as Ward & Taylor, 2000). Free full text of this review article is available online.

TITLE: Virtual reality in anxiety disorders: the past and present
AUTHOR: Gorini, A & Riva, G
JOURNAL: Expert Reviews of Neurotherapeutics, 2008, 8, 215-33.
ABSTRACT: "One of the most effective treatments of anxiety is exposure therapy: a person is exposed to specific feared situations or objects that trigger anxiety. This exposure process may be done through actual exposure, with visualization, by imagination or using virtual reality (VR), that provides users with computer simulated environments with and within which they can interact. VR is made possible by the capability of computers to synthesize a 3D graphical environment from numerical data. Furthermore, because input devices sense the subject's reactions and motions, the computer can modify the synthetic environment accordingly, creating the illusion of interacting with, and thus being immersed within the environment. Starting from 1995, different experimental studies have been conducted in order to investigate the effect of VR exposure in the treatment of subclinical fears and anxiety disorders. This review will discuss their outcome and provide guidelines for the use of VR exposure for the treatment of anxious patients." [PUBMED abstract, Full Text pdf]

SUMMARY/TAKE HOME MESSAGE:
This article provides a good overview of the theoretical purpose of virtual reality treatemnt for phobias, the equipment and procedures used, and research to date. There is relatively breif coverage of driving phobia, specifically:

"Driving phobia, defined as a specific phobia, situational type in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV, is characterized by intense and persistent fear of driving, which increases as a person anticipates or is exposed to driving stimuli. People with driving phobia acknowledge that their fears are excessive or unreasonable, yet are unable to drive, or tolerate driving with considerable distress. The inability to drive results in a major loss of mobility and independence, which interferes with daily activities.

Currently, the only three studies we have found in literature suggest that VRET may be a quite promising intervention for treating driving phobia, but obviously, more controlled trials and follow-up evaluations are necessary to support these preliminary findings" (p218).

The studies referred to are:
* Wald J. Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for driving phobia: a multiple
baseline across-subjects design. Behav. Ther. 35, 621–635 (2004).
* Wald J, Taylor S. Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy to treat driving phobia: a case report. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 31(3–4), 249–257 (2000).
* Walshe DG, Lewis EJ, Kim SI, O’Sullivan K, Wiederhold BK. Exploring the use of computer games and virtual reality in exposure therapy for fear of driving following a motor vehicle accident. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 6(3), 329–334 (2003).

EXPERIMENTAL REPORT: Virtual Reality for the Psychophysiological Assessment of Phobic Fear: Responses During Virtual Tunnel Driving

PEER-REVIEWED

AUTHORS: Mühlberger, A., Bülthoff, H.H., Wiedemann, G., Pauli, P.
JOURNAL: Psychological Assessment 2007; 19: 340-346.

ABSTRACT: "An overall assessment of phobic fear requires not only a verbal self-report of fear but also an assessment of behavioral and physiological responses. Virtual reality can be used to simulate realistic (phobic) situations and therefore should be useful for inducing emotions in a controlled, standardized way. Verbal and physiological fear reactions were examined in 15 highly tunnel-fearful and 15 matched control participants in 3 virtual driving scenarios: an open environment, a partially open tunnel (gallery), and a closed tunnel. Highly tunnel-fearful participants were characterized by elevated fear responses specifically during tunnel drives as reflected in verbal fear ratings, heart rate reactions, and startle responses. Heart rate and fear ratings differentiated highly tunnel-fearful from control participants with an accuracy of 88% and 93%, respectively. Results indicate that virtual environments are valuable tools for the assessment of fear reactions and should be used in future experimental research."

SUMMARY: Most treatments for phobia involve some kind of counter conditioning. That is being placed in the feared situation, usually starting with low intensity, and replacing feelings of fear with feelings of relaxation. As the authors note, placing driving in a feared situation such as driving in a tunnel, is neither easy nor particularly safe.

This study further developed a virtual reality system as a fully controlled and safe substitute for real driving. The study shows that those with a specific fear of driving in tunnels did become more fearful during periods of simulation of tunnel driving, but not during open driving (there was also a control group that did not become afraid at all). this suggests that virtual reality systems may, in the future, have a useful role in treating driving phobias.

Fearfulness was measured from self-report, but also heart rate, and skin conductivity. Self report was the most useful measure, followed by heart rate with which it was moderately correlated. Skin conductivity was, well a bit rubbish all round.

MY THOUGHTS: This is all very nice... but can we move along with using it for actual treatments?

Mühlberger, A., Bülthoff, H., Wiedemann, G., & Pauli, P. (2007). Virtual reality for the psychophysiological assessment of phobic fear: Responses during virtual tunnel driving. Psychological Assessment, 19 (3), 340-346 DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.340

See also:
Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy to treat driving phobia: a case report

Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy to treat driving phobia: a case report

AUTHORS: Wald J, Taylor S
JOURNAL: Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2000, 31, 249-257

ABSTRACT: An AB case design was used to examine the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) in treating driving phobia. After a one week baseline, the patient received three treatment sessions over a ten day period. Treatment included practice of four VR driving scenarios. Peak anxiety decreased within and across sessions. Ratings of anxiety and avoidance declined from pre-treatment and post-treatment, with gains maintained at seven month followup. Phobia-related interference in daily functioning similarly decreased. The results suggest that it would be useful to further evaluate the efficacy of VRET for driving phobia in controlled clinical trials.

SUMMARY: A case study in which one woman received a sum total of three (of a planned eight) sessions with a virtual reality driving simulator. After treatment the subject drove more often and experienced less anxiety while driving.

MY THOUGHTS: I am rather surprised that the authors squeezed nine pages out of a case study that was curtailed to less than half of its intended length--well, partly thought very repetitive introduction and discussion sections. The subject apparently had a significant and chronic problem, however in the absence of any control the conclusions that can be drawn here are very limited. The subject was also actively seeking (and found) employment that required driving, highly likely to exhibit placebo effects, and quite possibly self-selecting (the way the subject was identified and selected is not described).

TAKE HOME MESSAGE: If a subject's driving anxiety is a conditioned phobia, virtual reality technology might be part of an effective program of systematic desensitization. Generally treatment programs put someone right into the car, and the authors of this paper correctly outline how this can be stressful, embarrassing and even potentially dangerous with some people. However a single, heavily confounded, case study doesn't really raise the effectiveness of this technique above the level of anecdote.